apanese Snack review : Social change and the family
Hunting and gathering society was the first time in a small nomadic bands and later in some places in the larger settlements and greater depths, (Wenke 1984) ตัดสินจากกลุ่มของ! Kung, Native American, Australian, and other lifestyles that are relatively rich in history, a group of hunters to keep their small - and quite likely to be equally cooperative. Although the alliance of marriage with a band that gathers hunters - the value of collaboration among their members more than continuing with the residents of a single band and fluidly may move from one band associated with one to and (Quale 1988), by ecologists, they are ideal for holding the value of living in harmony with other life forms, instead of striving to dominate and exploit them. However, the integration of families into modern life tends to be a long and difficult process. Most of the farming and pastoral Nomads tend to have a family, patriarchal, and the trend toward polygyny (Schneider and Gough 1961; Maccoby 1966) The effectiveness of the work of women tends to be limited to the herding of animals. and dairying, and food processing and preparation (Quale 1988), exchange relationships will be set in place over the area to spread widely, with the marriage may be strategically located, and the exchange of the daughter of. Marriage may help to cement an alliance economy. All these movements are difficult to integrate them because it interferes with the education of their children and health care as a member. A purity of family homelessness may be the exception rather than the rule Dinka of Sudan, for example, the growth is about one-third and collect and hunt a two-thirds of the type of food they consume (Zeitlin 1977), women's and men Dinka old. tend to be sedentary throughout the year, while young men are nomadic pastoralists to become part of the year (Deng 1972). Society participation in traditional agriculture, crafts, and trade has been divided into those landowners and local communities and landowners are personal training (Caldwell and Caldwell 1990) Most of the population of Europe and Asia to make change. Central to the owners of private land from 4,000 to 5,000 years ago in response to the accumulation of excess significance of agriculture can be a wealth of other sources, such as copper mining in sub - Saharan Africa,. separated by deserts and the growing conditions that do not favor the accumulation of surplus community land ownership is still dominant. Polygyny, a form of hosts is well suited for agriculture to move the abundance of low yield land, the community's culture of technology workers (Caldwell and Caldwell 199 ()) the wife more, and her children to the family farm, its great. and to achieve economies of scale in labor and trade. The family, which is headed by the husband and the elders of his lineage, starting with a wife and increasing the accumulation of wealth that are needed for each bride. Wives and children, this unit is larger and more lucrative it becomes. Wife's sexual fidelity is not the highest priority and every child born to bring the illusion of legitimacy of his men. Social form of this family appears to place the cultural and religious backgrounds in child-bearing by Quale (1988), it may not be appropriate to think of all the people of Agriculture as early as this format. on agricultural development in the topsoil that is rich in deposits, localized flooding of the river every year. Monogamous marriage with a strong culture for the protection of women's sexual fidelity is crucial for the maintenance of traditional subsistence farming to private farming. Land that their families will be passed to heirs male of paternity is beyond question. For greater security in the transmission of land, the cross-cousin marriage may be needed. Brother married with children, gathered in the land and other property to be inherited separately. Cousin marriage has been common in many cultures with the current rates of about 60 percent of her total claimed for Pakistan (1992 DHSL Education / Institute of the population) may also help reduce the feuds property. related to social integration between farmers and other farmers in the Middle East (Sweet 1970). In spite of the ethnographic model of agriculture is known as a family. These global institutions are organized around the family settled on agricultural production, traditional crafts, or other family business ventures, they have a large network of relatives and regulatory authority hierarchy. All of these manufacturers, employers, consumers and social welfare agencies in one. And families tend to be well developed. The maximum value is the responsibility of the family (Doherty, 1992). The relative maximum a person can be tracked fairly closely with the expectation that 50 (Quale 1988), the hierarchical structure of Yoruba descent (ch. 7), located from 20 to 2,000 member groups. together in a walled compound in The family unit in view of the people living and working under the watchful eye of the head of the compound. Marriage and family institutions as a partner rather than a romantic relationship. Children are more likely to be worth it for the next student and manager of the land in the family and the workplace. Current and historical records indicate. However, both past and present day farming families living in institutions, often do not have large housing units.economy close to their families and community members and in their attitudes toward family life (Hareven 1987). The evolution of the family. According to them, family and community structures to adapt to the physical and social conditions of production (Wenke 1984) a similar evolutionary forces lead to changes in the dynamics of families and children. Parents to raise their children's behavior to the risk they perceive in their environment that they expect their children to be mature and cultural and economic expectations. they have their children (Levine 1974; Levine, Miller and West 1988) the interplay between the powerful technology of social structure and values of society is the family. But technology is not the chief cultural strengths. Same production technology, and ecological conditions to support changes in family organization, management style and emotional climate. In Indonesia, for example, Java is known for its warmth toward children (ch. 7), while their Alorese that have been reported to be low nurturance of children in the coastal West African Yoruba and Ibo of Nigeria, there are different hierarchical patrilineal, the settlement of family and gender roles. The inheritance is matrilineal Akan of Ghana, both American and Japanese industry. But different cultures. Similar changes in technology to stimulate a change in the family in a similar direction. But from a different starting point and a variable
apanese Snack review : Social change and the family
No comments:
Post a Comment